| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3670 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3657 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3355 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 3353 |
| 6 | squareOf105 | 3346 |
| 7 | tourist | 3343 |
| 8 | strapple | 3324 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 143 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 133 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | qwexd | 130 |
|
0
something to consider when looking at their C2 CE submission is how they forgot to include the specifically, these error lines from the compiler: so it might just be a mistake after all, it doesn't take too much time to insert furthermore, they might have added still, it doesn't hurt to prepare for the worst (especially since they solved E1), i'm just sharing my opinion here. |
|
+8
did you really, really have to reveal their info like that |
|
0
orz lgm |
|
0
so i'm pretty sure this wasn't stolen from last year |
|
0
chess battle advanced |
|
+10
my friends are sending pictures of them becoming lgm right now |
| Name |
|---|


