| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3670 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3657 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3355 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 3353 |
| 6 | squareOf105 | 3346 |
| 7 | tourist | 3343 |
| 8 | strapple | 3324 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 143 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 133 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | qwexd | 130 |
|
0
ShadowCoder24 Attention! Your solution 379389894 for the problem 2237D significantly coincides with solutions ShadowCoder24/379389894, Mahishah_26/379405609. Such a coincidence is a clear rules violation. Note that unintentional leakage is also a violation. For example, do not use ideone.com with the default settings (public access to your code). If you have conclusive evidence that a coincidence has occurred due to the use of a common source published before the competition, write a comment to post about the round with all the details. More information can be found at http://codeforces.me/blog/entry/8790. Such violation of the rules may be the reason for blocking your account or other penalties. In case of repeated violations, your account may be blocked. I would like to clarify that I do not know either of the mentioned users personally. They are not from my college, hometown, or social circle, and I have never communicated or collaborated with them in any way regarding this contest or any other programming activity. The similarity appears to be purely coincidental. The solution was written entirely by me during the contest, and I fully understand every part of the code. If required, I am willing to explain the logic, approach, and implementation details of my solution to demonstrate that it is my own work. I have always tried to follow the Codeforces rules and fair-play guidelines. I did not share my code with anyone, nor did I obtain code from any other participant. Therefore, I believe this may be a misunderstanding caused by multiple participants arriving at a similar implementation for the same problem. I respectfully request that my case be reviewed individually. I am happy to provide any further clarification if needed. Thank you for your time and consideration. |
| Name |
|---|


