StarSilk's blog

Missing constraint in 2089E
By StarSilk, history, 12 hours ago, In English

It can be inferred that 2089E has a constraint that guarantees the sum of $$$n$$$ does not exceed $$$80$$$.

https://codeforces.me/contest/2089/hacks/1121475

Validator 'vadilator2.exe' returns exit code 3 [FAIL The sum of n exceeds 80. (test case 10)].

But the constraint is missing in the problem statement.

upd:the constraint has been added.

  • Vote: I like it
  • +141
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
12 hours ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it -10 Vote: I do not like it

and nobody noticed? That's bad.

→ Reply
»
11 hours ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -72 Vote: I do not like it

who cares?

→ Reply
»
9 hours ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +16 Vote: I do not like it

Unfortunately, we forgot to specify this constraint in the statmenet. I apologize for this mistake(

This constraint has been added to the task statement.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    9 hours ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

    When will the editorials be released? Also I wanted to add that the problems were good but please make the testers proof read the final problem statements, c had so many issues, b was unclear, a didnt mention if it was a decimal symbol or multiplication symbol. I hope youll fix these issues next time. Also i wanted see proof of correctness of problem D. [I am talking about the Div2]

    → Reply
»
8 hours ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

Although the problem statement has been fixed, there is still a typo: casese should be cases, and it's more formal to add a period after the sentence.

→ Reply