| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3892 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3797 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
| 4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
| 5 | ksun48 | 3588 |
| 6 | ecnerwala | 3557 |
| 7 | Ormlis | 3532 |
| 8 | Benq | 3468 |
| 9 | Radewoosh | 3463 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3450 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 165 |
| 2 | Qingyu | 159 |
| 3 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 158 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 156 |
| 6 | adamant | 154 |
| 7 | djm03178 | 151 |
| 8 | luogu_official | 150 |
| 9 | awoo | 148 |
| 10 | maomao90 | 145 |
Missing constraint in 2089E
It can be inferred that 2089E has a constraint that guarantees the sum of $$$n$$$ does not exceed $$$80$$$.
https://codeforces.me/contest/2089/hacks/1121475
Validator 'vadilator2.exe' returns exit code 3 [FAIL The sum of n exceeds 80. (test case 10)].
But the constraint is missing in the problem statement.
upd:the constraint has been added.
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en3 |
|
StarSilk | 2025-03-25 13:35:53 | 0 | Tiny change: 'statement.' -> 'statement.\n\nupd:the constraint has been added.' (published) | |
| en2 |
|
StarSilk | 2025-03-25 13:35:29 | 38 | Tiny change: 'statement.' -> 'statement.\n\nupd:the constraint has been added.' (saved to drafts) | |
| en1 |
|
StarSilk | 2025-03-25 11:08:21 | 336 | Initial revision (published) |
