| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3670 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3657 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3355 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 3353 |
| 6 | squareOf105 | 3346 |
| 7 | tourist | 3343 |
| 8 | strapple | 3324 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 144 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | qwexd | 130 |
| Название |
|---|



I know an O(n * sqrt(n)) approach, but I don't know its proof. I think proving it is difficult, so just take it as magic :)
Let P(n) = number of partitions of n.
Then, P(n) = P(N — 1) + P(N — 2) — P(N — 5) — P(N — 7) + ...
The k-th term of sum in absolute value is P(N — x[k]). The signs of sum's terms alternate from 2 to 2, so they are ++--++--++-- and so on. By x[k] I noted k-th pentagonal number . By formula of pentagonal numbers it's easy to see that when calculating P(n) you add about sqrt(n) numbers (because there are about sqrt(n) pentagonal numbers <= n) so complexity is O(n * sqrt(n)).
Well, proving it is reading the Wikipedia article on pentagonal numbers :D Aside from that, an
approach should pass comfortably.