# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3856 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
4 | Um_nik | 158 |
5 | atcoder_official | 156 |
6 | djm03178 | 153 |
7 | adamant | 152 |
8 | luogu_official | 149 |
9 | awoo | 147 |
10 | TheScrasse | 146 |
Name |
---|
I know an O(n * sqrt(n)) approach, but I don't know its proof. I think proving it is difficult, so just take it as magic :)
Let P(n) = number of partitions of n.
Then, P(n) = P(N — 1) + P(N — 2) — P(N — 5) — P(N — 7) + ...
The k-th term of sum in absolute value is P(N — x[k]). The signs of sum's terms alternate from 2 to 2, so they are ++--++--++-- and so on. By x[k] I noted k-th pentagonal number . By formula of pentagonal numbers it's easy to see that when calculating P(n) you add about sqrt(n) numbers (because there are about sqrt(n) pentagonal numbers <= n) so complexity is O(n * sqrt(n)).
Well, proving it is reading the Wikipedia article on pentagonal numbers :D Aside from that, an
approach should pass comfortably.