| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
| Name |
|---|



I know an O(n * sqrt(n)) approach, but I don't know its proof. I think proving it is difficult, so just take it as magic :)
Let P(n) = number of partitions of n.
Then, P(n) = P(N — 1) + P(N — 2) — P(N — 5) — P(N — 7) + ...
The k-th term of sum in absolute value is P(N — x[k]). The signs of sum's terms alternate from 2 to 2, so they are ++--++--++-- and so on. By x[k] I noted k-th pentagonal number . By formula of pentagonal numbers it's easy to see that when calculating P(n) you add about sqrt(n) numbers (because there are about sqrt(n) pentagonal numbers <= n) so complexity is O(n * sqrt(n)).
Well, proving it is reading the Wikipedia article on pentagonal numbers :D Aside from that, an
approach should pass comfortably.