|
0
A simple typo: inversw ackermann function -> inverse ackermann function |
|
+8
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_b946da100102vg6n.html Is this correct? I see you are in the Asia Bonus for ICPC Hosting Contribution list, congrats! |
|
+18
Patpat! |
|
0
Asnwer -> Answer :-) |
|
+8
|
|
0
Ooops, for the newbie like me, it's almost the standard way. |