Hello, how can Kruskal's algorithm be modified to run in O(n^2) time in a dense graph of n nodes??
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3993 |
2 | jiangly | 3743 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | Benq | 3564 |
7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 155 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
10 | nor | 152 |
Название |
---|
This seems well explained and it has cpp code.
Why do you need Kruskal for such a task? Prim have your desired complexity, and is not much harder to implement compare to Kruskal.
I am thinking that since Kruskal is usually faster to implement from scratch compared to Prim, the OP was hoping for an easy modification to Kruskal to achieve O(N^2) time complexity on dense graphs so that he could use it in more contexts during contests.
What does OP mean?
Original poster
It's the same as O(V^2 + E) dijkstra, just linearly search for smallest cost vertex that hasn't been visited yet.
Edit: I meant prim