| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3670 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3657 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3355 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 3353 |
| 6 | squareOf105 | 3346 |
| 7 | tourist | 3343 |
| 8 | strapple | 3324 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 143 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 133 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
Overflow?
this is why you should #define int long long
use PythonJust asking out of curiosity. How to reach this page from the RATING page? I see no option of organization ratings there.
It appears under the "Top rated" section on the right side of the home page. There is a link to the Countries, Cities and the Organizations rating.
Thanks. But that's very confusing on behalf of CF. I do think that the options for these various ratings should also have been present on the ratings page that follow on clicking the RATING option in the top horizontal bar.
The thing should be asked is how in the blue hell the member count reached signed
INT_MAXto begin with (if that was unsigned, it's much more understandable to me).Hey, don't hate on them for being so impressive.
More seriously, it's probably underflow due to some caching. That organisation doesn't appear there anymore and it has 0 active members, so -1 could either mean "flagged for removing from the list" or some sort of 2x number_of_active_members-- that only gets corrected to 1x after something is recomputed. The latter case would be a bug, but it's all just temporary.
When you have two billion employees and still has less rating than YPU.
YPUorz
By the way,It isn't the last time...