Codeforces Round #406 Editorial

8 years ago, # ^ |

Is this a joke?
Why don't you do it the way Errichto did here? =)

→ Reply

nima10khodaveisi

8 years ago, # |

The fastest Editorial !!!

→ Reply

KeyurJain

8 years ago, # |

For Div.2 C, Can someone tell me what the initial values for all my nodes would be?

→ Reply

mimirrow

8 years ago, # ^ |

Final vertex would have "lose state", anything else would be undefined

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 4 →

can you explain the logic of marking final vertex as lost? i mean why not to mark it as won? when player moves the monster into black hole he wins, so why we should mark as lost

→ Reply

KeyurJain

8 years ago, # ^ |

But then how to recognise a loop state ? I was stuck in an infinite loop because I couldn't recognise the loop state.

→ Reply

baobab

8 years ago, # ^ |

I had the opposite problem. I was getting into infinite loops, recognizing them, and marking nodes as "loop". I couldn't get pretest #2 to pass, because I marked some nodes as "loop" prematurely. If I don't do that, I'm at infinite loop. I'm guessing the order in which you process nodes is very important. I don't understand why the editorial doesn't talk about that. You can not actually solve this with the solution given in the editorial.

→ Reply

Ahmad_RH

8 years ago, # ^ |

you can use bfs in this problem.(of course on the reverse graph) and you should have a cnt for every node in the graph that shows how many neighbors of this node is in win state. first add the black hole nodes to the bfs queue and color them as lose. then for every node in the queue(named cur) if it is colored in lose then for every neighbor in the reverse graph(bigraph with all the edges reversed) color them as win.but if cur was colored in win then for every neighbor you should add 1 to cnt of this node.if at any point cnt of someone equals the number of its edges you should color it as lose and add it to queue. at the end if a node was colored (in lose or win) print as it is colored else print loop. here is my code for more information. hope i could help sorry for bad english

→ Reply

baobab

8 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

Isn't this 2*7000^2 operations? We process every node and from each node there may be 7000 edges to other nodes. edit: Ah, it's not that heavy because we can stop after we have marked all 2*7000 states as solved!

→ Reply

xuanquang1999

8 years ago, # |

In Div1-C, how can we "use this segment tree to find the first r for an arbitrary k"?

→ Reply

arda

23 months ago, # ^ |

Actually I wonder that too, have you found a solution after 6 years?

→ Reply

8 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

+34

I solved Div.1 C with divide and conquer. First note that as k becomes greater, the answer will be less than or equal to previous answers. And for a fixed k, we can find the answer with binary search. So we can apply divide and conquer: 25753574

I failed to prove that this works in time, but it was accepted.

EDIT: With a little optimization(solve lower part(<=300) naively, and divide&conquer upper part(>300) using ans[300]) it runs faster. 25754474

→ Reply

TylerX

8 years ago, # ^ |

For a fixed k, we can also find the answer naively without binary search?

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

Oh you are right! I missed that point. Without binary search, much easier to code and fast.

25762803

→ Reply

TooDumbToWin

8 years ago, # ^ |

Can you explain the worst case complexity for this?

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

I suspect it's O(n log n) or O(n log^2 n), but I couldn't prove it: the worst case complexity is T(n, n) such that T(x, 1) = theta(x), T(x, k) = theta(n) + max(T(x / 2, i) + T(x / 2, k — i + 1)) for 1 <= i <= min(n / x, k). I have no further ideas.

→ Reply

samatbor

8 years ago, # ^ |

Can you please briefly explain what is the general idea of your solution? Can't fully understand the logic of your code(

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

+11

My first idea is from divide-and-conquer trick(DP optimization). It turns out that in my solution divide-and-conquer does not work well, but fortunately it did work in a different way than I expected. There can be only O(sqrt n) distinct solutions, and once you got ans[l] = ans[r] = x, ans[i] will be x for every l <= i <= r. My divide_and_conquer function "binary searches" the intervals of same answer.

→ Reply

bciobanu

8 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

I think it's of order O(N * sqrt(N)), because naive() is used for every distinct answer. Function f(k) = [N / K] takes $\text{[math]}$ distinct values for strictly positive integer K.

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

I think you're right. I just tested with n = 100000. naive function is called about 1500~1600 times with both random data and data of distinct integers (dat[i] = i).

→ Reply

TooDumbToWin

8 years ago, # ^ |

Overall complexity might be $\text{[math]}$ but naive() function may be called multiple times for even same answer. Consider all distinct values i.e. dat[i]=i. For N/2, 3N/4, 7N/8,... naive() will be called and the answer will be 2 each time. So for answer as 2, naive() will be called $\text{[math]}$ times.

→ Reply

fnch

8 years ago, # ^ |

Similar solution — but even more faster (notice this is Java). Idea is to cancel recursion and mark all values between low and high if low and high are the same. 25741766

→ Reply

ala99

8 years ago, # |

an appropriate name for this contest should be "Lose Yourself"!

→ Reply

OmarKhaled_

8 years ago, # |

Can someone explain B Div1 in a clearer way?

→ Reply

natsukagami

8 years ago, # |

+25

First time 0 solved, I love your contests <3

But seriously

I will never attempt to submit again if I am 1h15' late.

→ Reply

Mr.Adnan

8 years ago, # ^ |

-44

int i=3; while(i--) cout<<"I will never attempt to submit again if I am 1h15' late.\n";

→ Reply

http://codeforces.me/contest/786/submission/25744686

8 years ago, # |

Why in div2C / div1A we should mark position on black hole as lost?

→ Reply

fonmagnus

8 years ago, # ^ |

Because if we assume that if the monster is already in a black hole, the current player can't move anymore. Therefore he loses

→ Reply

AakashHanda

8 years ago, # |

In D1A, how are we deciding which node to chose to update next. If we arbitrarily chose some node, recursive calls may lead to a call back on this node, hence giving an infinite loop.

→ Reply

singhmanmeet40

8 years ago, # ^ |

+12

25756312 check my submission. we only update things when we are sure we got their correct value.

→ Reply

AakashHanda

8 years ago, # ^ |

Thank you, I tried looking at other codes but this one explains it well with all the comments.

→ Reply

Sazzon

8 years ago, # |

Your effort stands out from other rounds! Awesome job!

→ Reply

amethyst0

8 years ago, # |

In problem B I have a solution, which works in O(n * log(n))

→ Reply

hzyfr

8 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

+24

Div 1B solvable in single log complexity:

Use segment tree to record d for each position; additionally, keep track of the minimum d in a segment that is not yet visited.

Use interval tree to store all edges (keys are interval of start positions)

Now, modify "for each $\text{[math]}$ " step in Dijkstra's algorithm to

let $\text{[math]}$ be any edge s.t. $\text{[math]}$ ; delete edge $\text{[math]}$ (!)

Greedy property of shortest path problem guarantees the deletion to be correct. Therefore total complexity is O(VlogV + ElogE) = O(ElogE).

This also works fine on generalized, interval-to-interval edges.

→ Reply

HUECTRUM1

8 years ago, # ^ |

Could you please explain how segtree works with this problem? I don't quite realise what each node of the tree represents.

→ Reply

satyaki3794

8 years ago, # ^ |

+31

What do you do when you run a normal Dijkstra algorithm? You push the nodes in the priority queue. Every time you pop an unvisited as-of-yet node from the priority queue with the least distance, mark it as visited and consider all its neighbours. If for some neighbour, the new distance you get is smaller than the current distance to it, you update its distance and push it into the priority queue.

In this problem, you use a segment tree to replace the priority queue. Then you can update distances to the neighbours using a point update (for type-1 edges) or a range update (for type-2 edges). For the type-3 edges, you need to observe the fact that you will consider them only once, i.e. when you mark a vertex in its range as visited for the first time. That is because, for all other unvisited vertices in that range, their shortest-distance from source will never be less than this vertex.

Code
tree[] is the equivalent of the priority queue.
tree2[] returns any of the remaining type-3 edges which contain a particular vertex v in its range.
You can ignore the BIT. It is not used anywhere in the code. :)

→ Reply

happy15

4 years ago, # ^ |

For the type-3 edges, you need to observe the fact that you will consider them only once, i.e. when you mark a vertex in its range as visited for the first time. That is because, for all other unvisited vertices in that range, their shortest-distance from source will never be less than this vertex.

This is crucial. Thanks for the hint.

→ Reply

shubhamcr7

8 years ago, # |

+16

Git Repository ain't working

→ Reply

tantam75

8 years ago, # |

Please help me :( I can't find out why my code was wrong: My code

→ Reply

AndreiM

8 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

you break the "while(k--)" loop as soon as you find the complement of a value x. suppose you have an input like:

4 2

1 1 -1 3

4 1 3 2 -3

when you stop the loop at "-1" and read k = 3 so you will try the next 3 values 4 1 3 :)

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

your solution has totally broken logic
at least you didn't take into account that one user can be in many groups many times

→ Reply

__important__

8 years ago, # |

memory limit is so strictly !!!

→ Reply

DoesNotCompute

8 years ago, # |

Thanks, you have nice problems + cute pictures = solid contest!

→ Reply

tfg

8 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

+31

I managed to solve Div1 C using some kind of sqrt decomposition. Link to submission: http://codeforces.me/contest/786/submission/25756668

Solve using the greedy algorithm for the first sqrt(n) answers. For the rest of the answers, keep the intervals that you use and the frequency of each color inside it. From one step to the other you need to stretch the intervals as far as possible. There are at most sqrt(n) intervals and each has 2 pointers: the left bound and the right bound. Each bound can go from 1 to n (they always go right) so the complexity of this part is O(n*sqrt(n)).

→ Reply

singhmanmeet40

8 years ago, # ^ |

nice approach :)

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 3 →

tfg please help!

Could you prove why the second part of the algorithm has N*sqrtN complexity?

There are N-sqrtN values of 'k' left to be processed, and for each 'k' the left and right pointers might update O(n) times, making the complexity N*N. This is because the l[x] and r[x] pointers increment by steps of 1.

How can we say that l[x] and r[x] pointers update total of only N*sqrtN times over all 'k' that are to be processed after solve() ?

edit — I was able to prove it.

→ Reply

Pepe.Chess

8 years ago, # |

+77

PrinceOfPersia

I solved problem C using only a binary indexed tree

But I solved all the queries together starting from the first element , taking the rightmost valid position for each query , and then pushing it on the next position (after the rightmost) to continue afterwards.

Of course maintaining the number of distinct elements from every start to every other position (a trivial problem) when i finish a position i remove the element and increment the next occurrence in BIT

my code is very clear

code

I was surprised that this problem was div1C :D

→ Reply

mad.russian

8 years ago, # |

-9

I've got a little bit easier approach that doesn't require persistent data structures. We can find the answer for each k simultaneously going from the beginning of the array a to its end and finding k-th minimum (using treap) for each k which has an end of a block at corresponding position. Details can be found in the solution: 25756864

→ Reply

paroothisumit95

8 years ago, # |

+34

Can someone please post a good explanation of DIV2 C.

→ Reply

satyaki3794

8 years ago, # ^ |

+64

You can think of it this way. Positions are characterized as winning or losing positions. If, from a state, you can send the opponent to a losing state, then you will ALWAYS make that move and the current state is winning. On the other hand, if all moves from the current state lead to a winning state for the opponent, you can NEVER win because no matter what you do, the opponent will win. So, the current state is a losing state for you.

This is exactly what has been used. The black hole is a losing state for the current player. There are 2n states in this game, (player, index) indicates that the monster is at 'index' location and it is the turn of 'player' (0<=player<=1).

In the BFS, if the current node is a losing state, then for all adjacent nodes which are unvisited, mark them as winning for the opponent.

If the current node is winning for the current player, just increment some count (which you're maintaining for each node) for its adjacent nodes. If for any neighbour, count becomes equal to the number of allowed moves from that state, that means EVERY move from that neighbour leads to a winning state. Hence, that neighbour is a losing state.

Now what remains are the unvisited vertices from the BFS. They are part of an infinite game. You can think of it this way. Suppose an unvisited state S has X neighbours. Out of them, some Y (Y<X) are winning. None of S's neighbours can be losing (because then S would be winning, not unvisited). Similarly, Y<X (because if Y==X then S is losing). In each move, you move the monster from an unvisited node to another unvisited node and this goes on and on. :)

→ Reply

Your_dad

8 years ago, # ^ |

This comment should be the editorial :)

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

-10

what does "deg" stand for? i see this naming in many submissions of this problem

→ Reply

PrinceOfPersia

8 years ago, # ^ |

Vertex degree?

→ Reply

satyaki3794

8 years ago, # ^ |

Yes, vertex degree.

→ Reply

savy_s

8 years ago, # ^ |

can you explain how does this count help in finding losing state ?

→ Reply

animeshf

8 years ago, # ^ |

If every node that you can reach from a node v (using some set of moves S) is a winning node, then v is a losing node (with respect to the set S).

→ Reply

towrist

4 years ago, # ^ |

WOW! Thanks a lot man for the insanely simple solution and proof.

→ Reply

usernameson

8 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

Div 2 A was harder than I expected. I tried to solve the equation exactly and couldn't then I just said screw it I will just try all values of i and j from 1 to 1000 and if I haven't found an answer by I will assume that exist and it worked. It is nice to read that this reasoning was actually correct.

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

I have tried different k values from 0 to 10⁸: time = b + k·a.
Now try to find m ≥ 0 such that time = d + m·c.

This solution is very easy to come up with and understand its correctness. No need for gcd's and lcm's :)

→ Reply

Cydiater

8 years ago, # |

Problem set is good!

→ Reply

King_George

8 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

+24

I solved Div1. C with an sqrt decomposition.

When K is smaller than $\text{[math]}$ , we can do an O(N) brute force to get the answer. We need to do this for $\text{[math]}$ times with each time O(N), so the total complexity is $\text{[math]}$ .

When K gets bigger than $\text{[math]}$ , we can find that the answer is at most N / K. We maintain the squads when solving each K. When K changes to K + 1, we just need to check how many elements of the next squad (or maybe the next squad of the next squad, etc.) can be added into the previous one for each squad, and update it. The answer changes at most $\text{[math]}$ times here, so each element will be added to a new squad at most $\text{[math]}$ times. And each time we just need to check $\text{[math]}$ squads, so the total time complexity is also $\text{[math]}$ .

Check my code for details 25762112 :D

→ Reply

KKpoker

8 years ago, # ^ |

thanks for sharing~ seems sqrt algorithm can be used to solve many data-structure problems? and easier

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

Your code is too obfuscated >.< !!!!!

Hard to read even with g++ -E :|

→ Reply

thangitcbg

5 years ago, # ^ |

nice approach =)) tks u <3

→ Reply

-14

8 years ago, # |

Very nice problem set! One of the best problem sets that I have ever met.

Although I wasn't able to solve a single problem in the contest... but I still thank you for high-quality problems and nice editorials.

→ Reply

codearth

8 years ago, # |

can someone plz explain what's actually is to be done in DIV 1 A??

→ Reply

Nemaleswang

8 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

-13

Can I say mmp!?

→ Reply

porwalok

8 years ago, # |

What is the error in my code ,showing WA on a pretest. My submission: http://codeforces.me/contest/787/submission/25749836

→ Reply

chrt

8 years ago, # ^ |

    if(a[d*-1]==1)
	    {f=1;break;}

Remove the break here, since you haven't finished reading the input in that line.

→ Reply

mayukh78

8 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

For div 2 A how to prove "if a, b, c, d ≤ N, and such i and j exist, then i, j ≤ N" ?

→ Reply

friend

8 years ago, # ^ |

We have to solve a Diophantine equation: b + ia = d + jc, with a, b, c, d ≤ N.

This is equivalent to ai + ( - c)j = d - b.

If this equation has a solution (i₀, j₀), with i₀, j₀ > N, then we can construct all other solutions, like so:

$\text{[math]}$ and $\text{[math]}$ , where $\text{[math]}$ and d = gcd(a, - c) = gcd(a, c).

Now, given this way of construction and that $\text{[math]}$ , $\text{[math]}$ , we see that we can keep reducing the values i₀ and j₀, until at least one of them is between 1 and N.

Thus, in our algorithm, if suffices, to inspect values i and j such that 1 ≤ i, j ≤ N. This yields a complexity of O(N).

This is the most rigorous proof I could come up with while refreshing some number theory concepts I had forgotten about, but in a contest environment you probably don't need this kind of thinking, as you can just rely on your instinct and simply plug in value i within some big constraints, like 1 ≤ i ≤ 10⁶. This, I suspect, works just fine.

→ Reply

xennygrimmato

8 years ago, # |

For Div1 A — Berzerk, why is this property true: If a state has an edge to a lost state, it's won? Can someone provide an intuition/proof for it?

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

If the first player loses then the other player MUST win. That is, in order for player2 to win, player1 has to lose.

→ Reply

T0RRES

8 years ago, # |

There is another simple solution for div.1 C. Let's take some answer and define r[i,j] — rightmost point of j-th block where k=i. Obviously that r[i,j]<=r[i+1,j]. j-th block where k=i cover segment r[i,j-1]+1...r[i,j]. Let's build optimal answer by adding 1-st block for every k, then 2-nd, then 3-rd and so on. Let's imagine we calculated r[i,j] for i=1...n, j=1...x. How to calculate for j=x+1? Let's greedy get x+1 block for k=1. Okay. It's easy. Let's maintain cnt[val] — count of occurancies of val on our current segment. When we move our segment we can maintain count of different values on it. Okay. We get r[1,x+1], how to get r[2,x+1]? For k=x+1 we have needed data for segment r[1,x]+1..r[1,x+1]. Let's define bounds of current segment as L and R. We know that L>r[2,x+1], so we just move leftmost bound of our segment right until inequality is not satisfied. Now when we moved our segment left bound right as far as we can, we can move rightmost bound also. Just. Do it. Move R right until the end of array or next element will mage our segment "bad"(too many different elements). And so on for i=3...n.

Link : 25759518

I am not sure in time complexity of the solution so will be grateful if someone help me with it.

→ Reply

8 years ago, # |

In Div 2B, what is CNF formula and how to solve it. And how the complexity suppose to be O(n+m). I'm able to solve it only in O(m*n)

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

If there are 2 opposite numbers in a group (for example, 3 and - 3), then this group cannot be a bad group. Otherwise, that group can be bad.

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

I get that. But I'm not able to get that how it's gonna solve in O(m+n) instead of O(m*n) complexity.

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

I see. I think that he has put a plus sign instead of multiplication because of the statement: "Sum of k for all groups does not exceed 10⁴". In general case, your estimate of O(n·m) is better.

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

Actually i think the complexity can be optimised by using that CNF equation, which he is using in tutorial. Do someone know about that CNF formula.

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

You are wrong. The complexity cannot be less than the input size :)

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

Oh ya that thing I didn't consider mistakenly. So now the complexity is O(m*n). But can you suggest some reading material or something on that CNF equation. It might not be needed in this question but who knows I can use that in some other question.

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

Usually, these types of problems are about 2-CNF and they start appearing from Div2D. It is pretty difficult to understand how to solve them. I don't think it is a good investment of your time.

That being said, here is an article 2-SAT :)

→ Reply

8 years ago, # |

← Rev. 3 →

Can someone explain div 2 D editorial clearly ?

PrinceOfPersia please explain how to handle 3rd type query. Nvm, figured it :)

→ Reply

fonmagnus

8 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

I want to ask a question about Div2D / Div1B Legacy

Code

My accepted solution is build 2 different segment trees which connect vertex on the main graph to node on the segment tree I that covers the range at query type 2. And for segment tree II i use in query type 3, i add a directed edge from node which covers the range to vertex v on main graph.

I still not sure about 1 thing. Why we need to build 2 different segment trees for different plan? Because at first, my code only build 1 segment tree that uses for both plans and it produces an incorrect output.

Anyone would help me to understand? Thanks in advance

→ Reply

chrt

8 years ago, # ^ |

There should be both a directed edge from a leaf node to its parent and a directed edge from a non-leaf node to its children, or our graph isn't equivalent to the original one. We cannot add them in the same segment tree, so we build two of them and add an directed edge between the corresponding leaf nodes. This is my understanding.

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 9 →

I think these edges are unidirectional, as [l,r]->v == ( [l,(l+r)/2]->v U [1+(l+r)/2,r]->v ) but [l,(l+r)/2]->v != ( [l,r]->v U x ) where x is anything.

If we have [l,r]-w->v and [l,r]-0->[l,(l+r)/2] and [l,r]-0->[1+(l+r)/2,r] then [l,(l+r)/2]-w->v and [1+(l+r)/2,r]-w->v are also true, but we can't add these last two edges in our dijkstra-graph in logn time. We must represent [l,r]-w->v type edges in the second segment tree.

In the second segment tree, the edges will be like these:
[l,r]-w->v
[l,(l+r)/2]-0->[l,r] [1+(l+r)/2,r]-0->[l,r]

We must add seg1[l,l]-0->v and v-0->seg2[l,l] to connect the two segment trees.

Now we have connected both segment trees and all relationships are correctly represented with edges. See that the direction of edges in the segment trees are opposite to each other ( parent to child for query type 2, in first segment tree ) and ( child to parent for query type 3, in second segment tree )

→ Reply

chrt

8 years ago, # ^ |

Thanks for your reply. Maybe my expression is not accurate. The directed edge from a non-leaf node to its children is in the first segment tree (for the second type v->[l,r]). The directed edge from a node to its parent is in the second segment tree (for the third type [l,r]->v). These can make sure two real nodes are reachable if and only if there's an edge we get from the input.

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 3 →

Let me explain it.

[l,r]-w->v represents edge from vertex range [l,r] to vertex v ( 3rd type query ) and has weight w.

If there is a 3rd type query [l,r]-w->v then this implies that
[l,(l+r)/2]-w->v ...(1)
[1+(l+r)/2,r]-w->v ...(2)

But we can't add the edges (1) and (2) in log time, as we have to add edges of their left and right child too recursively. If we don't add edges (1) and (2) ( and their children as well ) then we can't properly represent the relation [l,r]-w->v in our graph when we run dijkstra later. But adding all these child edges takes O(n) per query of type 3.

Surely, the first segment tree will not be able to handle the 2nd and 3rd queries both, as the 2nd query is like v-w->[l,r] which easily represents the relationships of children of [l,r] with v due to the edges [l,r]-0->[left child of [l,r] ] and [l,r]-0->[right child of [l,r] ].

I hope my explanation is clear now.

→ Reply

fonmagnus

8 years ago, # ^ |

Ah thanks a lot for your explanation. Now i get the big picture about the idea.

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

I'm glad you found it helpful :)

→ Reply

azzammohamed923

8 years ago, # |

can anyone please explain B div2 ?

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

Can you share your current understanding of the problem, so that we could fill in the gaps? =)

→ Reply

azzammohamed923

8 years ago, # ^ |

can you explain the second and the third tests

→ Reply

8 years ago, # ^ |

In the second test both groups have a pair of opposite numbers, so these groups cannot be bad.

In the third test case both of the groups can be bad because they don't contain opposite numbers.

→ Reply

Ehsan_sShuvo

7 years ago, # ^ |

I couldn't figure that out why having opposite numbers into a group don't be considered as a bad group?Basically,i want to know where Problem statement said such type of logic? egor.okhterov :)

→ Reply