| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 135 |
| 8 | BledDest | 132 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 131 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
| Name |
|---|



first time seeing normal blog by CarViz
Auto comment: topic has been updated by CarViz (previous revision, new revision, compare).
I think the runtime error is most likely caused by this line:
You access
primel[lp]before checking whetherlpis still within the bounds ofprimel. Iflpbecomes equal tolen(primel), this causes anIndexError: list index out of range.Also, this line can cause an
IndexErrorif any value inlis greater thanlen(l):For example, if
len(l) = 3butlcontains100, thendp[99]is out of bounds.You should check the constraints and make sure the prime list is large enough, and also verify that every value in
lis a valid index fordp.I guess he learned how to pocket solve