| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3670 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3657 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3355 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 3353 |
| 6 | squareOf105 | 3346 |
| 7 | tourist | 3343 |
| 8 | strapple | 3324 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 143 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | qwexd | 130 |
|
mkagenius
|
15 years ago,
show (+1)
#
|
|
mkagenius
|
15 years ago,
hide
#
|
0
Can this be used to find the highest point of the lowest envelope?
(i will use it in graphical method to solve two-person-zero-sum game (2Xn matrix) ) If yes , then plz tell how ? (if you have free time :) )
→
Reply
|
|
MarioYC
|
15 years ago,
show
#
|
|
MarioYC
|
15 years ago,
hide
#
^
|
0
Hi, I haven't finished reading it, but decided to share it, since I haven't heard about it before. Now, about the highest I think it wouldn't be hard to find if you have the lines which form the segments that form the lowest envelope, as far as I understand the method gives you that. :)
→
Reply
|
| Name |
|---|


