| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3670 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3657 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3355 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 3353 |
| 6 | squareOf105 | 3346 |
| 7 | tourist | 3343 |
| 8 | strapple | 3324 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 143 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | qwexd | 130 |
The answer is yes: Droping_points. I believe it is broken for div 2 and div 4 the same way too.
MikeMirzayanov we need to fix this ASAP. There are 2 ways to do it, let's vote:
Change the notice from "rating should be between 0 and x" to "rating should be <= x".
Do not change the notice and forever prohibit users with negative rating from rated participation.
I think we should go further and ban negative-rated users from all avenues of participation in civil society.
I think we should just keep the rating on unsigned integer
LOL I support this.
So when people go below zero, they will get a rating of 4294967295. (unsigned integer overflow)