| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
| Name |
|---|



The answer is yes: Droping_points. I believe it is broken for div 2 and div 4 the same way too.
MikeMirzayanov we need to fix this ASAP. There are 2 ways to do it, let's vote:
Change the notice from "rating should be between 0 and x" to "rating should be <= x".
Do not change the notice and forever prohibit users with negative rating from rated participation.
I think we should go further and ban negative-rated users from all avenues of participation in civil society.
I think we should just keep the rating on unsigned integer
LOL I support this.
So when people go below zero, they will get a rating of 4294967295. (unsigned integer overflow)