# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3773 |
3 | Radewoosh | 3646 |
4 | ecnerwala | 3624 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
5 | Benq | 3620 |
7 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
8 | Geothermal | 3569 |
8 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | Um_nik | 163 |
2 | cry | 161 |
3 | maomao90 | 160 |
4 | -is-this-fft- | 159 |
5 | awoo | 158 |
6 | atcoder_official | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | nor | 154 |
9 | maroonrk | 152 |
10 | Dominater069 | 148 |
Name |
---|
Auto comment: topic has been updated by Bichpaket (previous revision, new revision, compare).
Auto comment: topic has been updated by Bichpaket (previous revision, new revision, compare).
Auto comment: topic has been updated by Bichpaket (previous revision, new revision, compare).
why do you think so
have you seen those submissions, it is clear that they tried to avoid plagiarism .
You are right,sorry for my mistakes.
Code obfuscation is not encouraged, right?
fyi it's banned
Wow, very smart way of avoiding plagiarism
I think the instructions (Assembly) were used to check for cheating, not the source code (text) itself.