### **Please see this**↵
↵
Yesterday was _Starters 173 (Rated upto < 2700)_↵
I am talking about problem- https://www.codechef.com/problems/MINOVER?tab=statement↵
↵
This was 3rd problem called Overwrite↵
↵
I couldn't solve this during the contest due to panic and pressure, today I tried looking into it deeply.↵
These are my findings -↵
↵
1) Correct Soln ( This is most voted ) — https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1132142555↵
↵
Verdict- Accepted ↵
↵
2) I copy pasted same code(after contest) — https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1132570276↵
↵
Verdict — TLE↵
↵
How did possibly the same codes worked differently? The approach used and time complexity is same in my code too ↵
↵
https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1132226217 (This was during contest again tle)↵
↵
Need feedback from the community on this issue.↵
↵
↵
↵
#### **Edit: found the submission O(n+m)**↵
↵
Link- https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1132254669↵
↵
Complexity of problematic code is O( (n-m)*m) (i hoped that it might work)↵
↵
But still it feels bad with such compiler level inconsistencies↵
↵
Yesterday was _Starters 173 (Rated upto < 2700)_↵
I am talking about problem- https://www.codechef.com/problems/MINOVER?tab=statement↵
↵
This was 3rd problem called Overwrite↵
↵
I couldn't solve this during the contest due to panic and pressure, today I tried looking into it deeply.↵
These are my findings -↵
↵
1) Correct Soln ( This is most voted ) — https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1132142555↵
↵
Verdict- Accepted ↵
↵
2) I copy pasted same code(after contest) — https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1132570276↵
↵
Verdict — TLE↵
↵
How did possibly the same codes worked differently? The approach used and time complexity is same in my code too ↵
↵
https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1132226217 (This was during contest again tle)↵
↵
Need feedback from the community on this issue.↵
↵
↵
↵
#### **Edit: found the submission O(n+m)**↵
↵
Link- https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1132254669↵
↵
Complexity of problematic code is O( (n-m)*m) (i hoped that it might work)↵
↵
But still it feels bad with such compiler level inconsistencies↵
