increment operator in C

Блог пользователя ikbal

Автор ikbal, 14 лет назад, По-английски

#include <stdio.h>     
#include <string.h>     

int main(){
   
	int y = 7 , z = 8 ; 
	int *p;
	
	p = &y ; 
	
	*p = (++z)+(y++);
	
	printf("%d\n",*p);
   
	return 0;	
}

This program's output is 8 Anyone know how is this?

implementations

ikbal
14 лет назад
13

Комментарии (10)

Показать архивные | Написать комментарий?

kingofnumbers

14 лет назад, скрыть # |

← Rev. 2 →

+16

hahaha XD.

MS C++ outputs 17 and GNU C++ outputs 8 :)

→ Ответить

Elun

14 лет назад, скрыть # |

+15

I think that's undefined behaviour

→ Ответить

Radetic

14 лет назад, скрыть # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

According to Kernighan & Ritchie's book The C Programming Language, 2nd Edition (ANSI C), by Prentice Hall, page 52:

"C, like most languages, does not specify the order in which the operands of an operator are evaluated. (The exceptions are &&, ||, ?: and ','.)"

Right on the next page (53) it continues with an example:

"printf("%d %d\n", ++n, power(2, n)); /* WRONG */ ... The solution, of course, is to write ++n; printf("%d %d\n", n, power(2, n));"

and at last, the expression "a[i] = i++;" is mentioned as a "one unhappy situation".

→ Ответить

ikbal

14 лет назад, скрыть # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

-8

→ Ответить

andreyv

14 лет назад, скрыть # ^ |

+10

Wrong. The order of evaluation of the function arguments is not specified.

The C99 standard, paragraph 6.5.2.3.10:

The order of evaluation of the function designator, the actual arguments, and subexpressions within the actual arguments is unspecified, but there is a sequence point before the actual call.

→ Ответить

vas.and.tor

14 лет назад, скрыть # |

+42

I just leave it here.

→ Ответить

kingofnumbers

14 лет назад, скрыть # ^ |

-10

if 10=1+2+3+4 and 16=4+4+4+4 then where did "11" come from?

→ Ответить

vas.and.tor

14 лет назад, скрыть # ^ |

+13

If it helps, this is how compiler translate the code above:

   0x0000000000400e58 <+8>:	movl   $0x0,-0x4(%rbp)
   0x0000000000400e5f <+15>:	addl   $0x1,-0x4(%rbp)
   0x0000000000400e63 <+19>:	addl   $0x1,-0x4(%rbp)
   0x0000000000400e67 <+23>:	mov    -0x4(%rbp),%eax
   0x0000000000400e6a <+26>:	lea    (%rax,%rax,1),%edx
   0x0000000000400e6d <+29>:	addl   $0x1,-0x4(%rbp)
   0x0000000000400e71 <+33>:	mov    -0x4(%rbp),%eax
   0x0000000000400e74 <+36>:	add    %eax,%edx
   0x0000000000400e76 <+38>:	addl   $0x1,-0x4(%rbp)
   0x0000000000400e7a <+42>:	mov    -0x4(%rbp),%eax
   0x0000000000400e7d <+45>:	add    %edx,%eax
   0x0000000000400e7f <+47>:	mov    %eax,-0x8(%rbp)
   0x0000000000400e82 <+50>:	mov    -0x8(%rbp),%eax

11 in %eax.

→ Ответить