Could anyone please explain the logic behind this problem.
problem link: Three Families
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3993 |
2 | jiangly | 3743 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | Benq | 3564 |
7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 155 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
10 | djm03178 | 152 |
Could anyone please explain the logic behind this problem.
problem link: Three Families
Название |
---|
ans=(c*(a+a-b))/(a+b);
could you please xplain ,how did u get that expression
Family C would only pay families A and B for doing the portion of work that was the responsibility of family C not for what their(A and B) individual responsibilities were. that is,for sample case total 9 hours of work had to be done (each family had to do 3 hours apiece).Now both A and B not only did their share of 3 hours but family A completed 2 hours of C's work and family B did 1 hour of C's work hence the ratio is 2:1. - Similarly for next sample B just did its assigned work while A did its assigned work and all the work assigned to C and hence get the full amount.