Could anyone please explain the logic behind this problem.
problem link: Three Families
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 136 |
| 8 | BledDest | 132 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 131 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
Could anyone please explain the logic behind this problem.
problem link: Three Families
| Name |
|---|



ans=(c*(a+a-b))/(a+b);
could you please xplain ,how did u get that expression
Family C would only pay families A and B for doing the portion of work that was the responsibility of family C not for what their(A and B) individual responsibilities were. that is,for sample case total 9 hours of work had to be done (each family had to do 3 hours apiece).Now both A and B not only did their share of 3 hours but family A completed 2 hours of C's work and family B did 1 hour of C's work hence the ratio is 2:1. - Similarly for next sample B just did its assigned work while A did its assigned work and all the work assigned to C and hence get the full amount.