Hello! I have a question: how to find value of , if we know value of
and we shouldnt find x, because it may be very-very big? Is it impossible?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3856 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
4 | Um_nik | 158 |
5 | atcoder_official | 156 |
6 | Qingyu | 155 |
7 | djm03178 | 151 |
7 | adamant | 151 |
9 | luogu_official | 150 |
10 | awoo | 147 |
Hello! I have a question: how to find value of , if we know value of
and we shouldnt find x, because it may be very-very big? Is it impossible?
Name |
---|
UPD: Это разные функции, но ничего. Уверен, они дают повод для размышлений.
for very large x.
Of course, if x is very-very big, then up to precision of your data types, the difference is negligible (if
is in the order of 103,
is in the order of 10 - 400) and you can just write
.
It can be shown that error is asymptotically small enough.
Thus if x if large enough you may say that
and get the error of order not more than O(1 / x2).
Actually you could take first k elements of Taylor series and precision will bedata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4229d/4229d0508b4e6000a016bd264c48aa3846a8eea7" alt=""