Hello! I have a question: how to find value of , if we know value of and we shouldnt find x, because it may be very-very big? Is it impossible?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3993 |
2 | jiangly | 3743 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | Benq | 3564 |
7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 155 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
10 | djm03178 | 152 |
Hello! I have a question: how to find value of , if we know value of and we shouldnt find x, because it may be very-very big? Is it impossible?
Name |
---|
UPD: Это разные функции, но ничего. Уверен, они дают повод для размышлений.
for very large x.
Of course, if x is very-very big, then up to precision of your data types, the difference is negligible (if is in the order of 103, is in the order of 10 - 400) and you can just write .
It can be shown that error is asymptotically small enough.
(Mean value theorem)
Thus if x if large enough you may say that and get the error of order not more than O(1 / x2).
Actually you could take first k elements of Taylor series and precision will be