Блог пользователя KaguyaH

Автор KaguyaH, история, 3 года назад, По-английски

'Good Bye 2023' is a controversial contest. Many want it to be unrated, while others want to keep it rated. Regardless of whether to cancel its rating, could you please explain your reasons? This may make everyone more convinced of your decision. Thank you! :)

MikeMirzayanov 74TrAkToR

  • Проголосовать: нравится
  • +204
  • Проголосовать: не нравится

»
3 года назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +170 Проголосовать: не нравится

I would want 74TrAkToR to stop coordinating div1s more than anything.

How come it has become normal that people knows before the contest even start that it'll be "unprepared" right after seeing the coordinator name?

»
3 года назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +27 Проголосовать: не нравится

I think the contest can be unrated only if the problems are stolen from somewhere or np hard or in the case of server down.

»
3 года назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +75 Проголосовать: не нравится

Has this been ghosted? I think most of the community feels this way.

MikeMirzayanov? (and 74TrAkToR if he still has any control over the process?)

»
3 года назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +98 Проголосовать: не нравится

Also, please respond to the following questions: Will 74TrAkToR stop coordinating contests, or will he continue? Will he make some changes? Please don’t bury your head in the sand, thanks :)

»
3 года назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +105 Проголосовать: не нравится

At this point, it seems it'll be rated. Surprisingly.

»
3 года назад, скрыть # |
← Rev. 2  
Проголосовать: нравится +53 Проголосовать: не нравится

There's been no official statement regarding the round, for 5 days now. Even if Mike does not think it is a serious issue, the community obviously does. Maybe Mike is having a hard time lately and is too busy to deal with us.

At the very least we must have a clarification on what type of rounds should become unrated going forward, because there seems to be a huge misunderstanding. I think that a round which has a problem with a semi-googlable solution, another problem whose model solution is incorrect and another problem (F) which appears to be almost stolen from another source (according to what some people posted), then it should become unrated.

For me, this silence means that such rounds are still valid as being rated, which worries me very deeply about the quality of codeforces rounds going forward and how the rating is less trustworthy. It is still my opinion, maybe you think that such rounds are completely valid and of proper quality, you make the rules after all...

Just make the rules clear please. Maybe going forward I'll begin every round by copy-pasting the complete problemset into chatGPT and asking it whether any of the problems looks familiar, and provide me some sources, maybe even scripting it ahead of time. Then I'll read the sources and implement what I read. Sounds like a shitty experience. I value my enjoyment of competitive programming, yet I value my rating as well, seems to be an issue.

MikeMirzayanov