I did this question by Segment tree but my solution is throwing TLE. I I think the TC is O(n logn) for larger cases. So I think it should work this way but it is failing. Is it not possible to further optimize it doing this way ?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3993 |
2 | jiangly | 3743 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | Benq | 3564 |
7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 155 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
10 | nor | 152 |
I did this question by Segment tree but my solution is throwing TLE. I I think the TC is O(n logn) for larger cases. So I think it should work this way but it is failing. Is it not possible to further optimize it doing this way ?
Name |
---|
well the segment tree is O(nlg)
but in program it takes the high coefficient cause this you got TLE
try to code better and don't get it :)
pragma will help