I did this question by Segment tree but my solution is throwing TLE. I I think the TC is O(n logn) for larger cases. So I think it should work this way but it is failing. Is it not possible to further optimize it doing this way ?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3856 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 168 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
4 | Um_nik | 159 |
5 | atcoder_official | 156 |
6 | djm03178 | 153 |
6 | adamant | 153 |
8 | luogu_official | 149 |
9 | awoo | 148 |
10 | TheScrasse | 146 |
I did this question by Segment tree but my solution is throwing TLE. I I think the TC is O(n logn) for larger cases. So I think it should work this way but it is failing. Is it not possible to further optimize it doing this way ?
Name |
---|
well the segment tree is O(nlg)
but in program it takes the high coefficient cause this you got TLE
try to code better and don't get it :)
pragma will help