| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3993 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3743 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | Benq | 3564 |
| 7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
| 9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 155 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 10 | nor | 152 |
I've stumbled upon a version of this problem with smaller constraints on another site: 177 — G2 and managed to solve it using a naive approach (I believe it'd get me 30% of the points in this version aswell).
But I really want to know the intended solution that works with such large constraints, any help is appreciated, thanks
The solution I can think of is rather advanced, it involves linear-time string matching (KMP or Rabin-Karp) and matrix exponentiation.
If we can perform Berlekamp-Massey on the result for small fibonacci strings (at least $$$|s_i| \le |S| \le 10\cdot |s_i|$$$), the templates made for the algorithm should be able to take case of the rest.