Can anybody explain me how to solve E using binnary search(I can`t understand editorial)
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 135 |
| 8 | BledDest | 132 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 131 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
| Name |
|---|



Note: I use 1-indexing and a translator.
Idea: let's go through all possible subarrays [i..j], and if sum of elements is equal to s, then recalculate the answer: ans = min(ans, i — 1 + n — j) — that is, we need to remove (i — 1) elements from the beginning and (n — j) from the end.
This is O(n^2), we can improve with binary search:
Let's count the prefix sums in the array a, and go through j. Then we need to find the leftmost i so that (a[j] — a[i — 1]) == s, in other words, find the leftmost (a[j] — s) in the prefix-sum array. Then the answer is recalculated in the same way as in the case of O(n^2).
Now O(n log n).
My solution: link
Why downvotes? I only help with solution!
thanks very much :) You realy help me bro)