| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3993 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3743 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | Benq | 3564 |
| 7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
| 9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 155 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 10 | nor | 152 |
TLE caused by using std::endl in C++
TLE code : https://codeforces.me/contest/1613/submission/137709567
Accepted code : https://codeforces.me/contest/1613/submission/137711275
The only difference is:
AC : fin(i,0,n){ cout<<v[i]<<"\n"; } TLE : fin(i,0,n){ cout<<v[i]<<endl; } I know endl is supposed to be a bit slower because it flushes the output, but how is the difference significant enough to give a TLE?
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
BrainNotFound | 2021-12-01 20:18:32 | 8 | ||
| en1 |
|
BrainNotFound | 2021-12-01 20:17:30 | 474 | Initial revision (published) |
