| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3670 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3657 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3355 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 3353 |
| 6 | squareOf105 | 3346 |
| 7 | tourist | 3343 |
| 8 | strapple | 3324 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 143 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 142 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | adamant | 137 |
| 8 | BledDest | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 133 |
| 10 | qwexd | 130 |
Tung Tung Tung Sahur
Guys
Did you know that Tung Tung Tung Sahur once had a rating of 4040, which is higher than Jiangly's maximum rating? However Bombardiro Crocodilo wrote a blog just like this one where he accused Tung Tung Tung Sahur of being a cheater due to long variable names. Tung Tung Tung Sahur was later banned from Codeforces. Let us all fight for the rights of Tung Tung Tung Sahur and his long variable names and let him return to Codeforces. 
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en4 |
|
AdornedLogarithm13 | 2026-07-01 13:38:09 | 73 | Tiny change: 'odeforces.' -> 'odeforces.\n' | |
| en3 |
|
AdornedLogarithm13 | 2026-07-01 13:37:20 | 69 | Reverted to en1 | |
| en2 |
|
AdornedLogarithm13 | 2026-07-01 13:37:01 | 69 | Tiny change: 'odeforces.' -> 'odeforces.\n\nhttps://codeforces.me/827a9c/TungTung.png' | |
| en1 |
|
AdornedLogarithm13 | 2026-07-01 13:36:12 | 462 | Initial revision (published) |
