Given two weighted, undirected graphs on $$$n$$$ nodes $$$G_1$$$ and $$$G_2$$$, is it possible to efficiently find a tree on these $$$n$$$ nodes that is an MST of both
Unable to parse markup [type=CF_MATHJAX]
?| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3857 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 3 | maroonrk | 3534 |
| 4 | tourist | 3528 |
| 5 | Kevin114514 | 3510 |
| 6 | turmax | 3411 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3367 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | strapple | 3317 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 145 |
| 4 | Errichto | 139 |
| 5 | adamant | 136 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 134 |
| 7 | nik_exists | 133 |
| 7 | DNR | 133 |
| 9 | AmShZ | 130 |
| 10 | Dominater069 | 129 |
Is it possible to find a common MST between two graphs?
Given two weighted, undirected graphs on $$$n$$$ nodes $$$G_1$$$ and $$$G_2$$$, is it possible to efficiently find a tree on these $$$n$$$ nodes that is an MST of both
Unable to parse markup [type=CF_MATHJAX]
?| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en6 |
|
shsh | 2026-04-23 22:10:08 | 2 | Tiny change: 'tively. \n- Note t' -> 'tively. \n\n- Note t' | |
| en5 |
|
shsh | 2026-04-23 09:32:59 | 192 | ||
| en4 |
|
shsh | 2026-04-23 09:31:03 | 1913 | Tiny change: ' possible.' -> ' possible.\n\nHere's a problem that uses this idea: [problem:1054G]' | |
| en3 |
|
shsh | 2025-07-20 09:35:23 | 8 | ||
| en2 |
|
shsh | 2025-07-20 09:34:43 | 1 | Tiny change: ' both $G_1 and $G_2$' -> ' both $G_1$ and $G_2$' | |
| en1 |
|
shsh | 2025-07-20 09:34:01 | 222 | Initial revision (published) |
| Name |
|---|


