| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3857 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 3 | maroonrk | 3534 |
| 4 | tourist | 3528 |
| 5 | Kevin114514 | 3510 |
| 6 | turmax | 3411 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3367 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | strapple | 3317 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Errichto | 139 |
| 5 | adamant | 136 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 134 |
| 7 | DNR | 133 |
| 8 | nik_exists | 131 |
| 8 | Dominater069 | 131 |
| 10 | Proof_by_QED | 130 |
|
0
Thank you. Now it makes sense. |
|
+5
You can't |
|
0
Thank you so much. I was able to get it accepted. Makes sense I am either inserting or deleting abc from the set. but instead doing it both when applicable gives the correct result. |
|
0
I believe that case is already covered internally in my code. if s[pos] is already c and string abc can be formed with the neighbouring characters we insert into the set which causes no change to the set since the set already contains that value. |
|
0
Can anyone help me understand why my submission for B is getting WA on test 3. My approach is exactly same as in editorial. can't seem to find the edge case. help will be truly appreciated.137250167 |
| Name |
|---|


