There're going to be held 2020 TCO South America and a parallel round. I didn't see any info about it anywhere, except from Arena. hmehta, is it rated?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 135 |
| 8 | BledDest | 132 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 131 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
There're going to be held 2020 TCO South America and a parallel round. I didn't see any info about it anywhere, except from Arena. hmehta, is it rated?
Here are 2 solutions of the same problem: 20274603, 20298628. The only difference between them is two-dimensional array last. In first case it was last[MAXN][MAXQ], and in the second one — last[MAXQ][MAXN]. MAXN = 103 + 7, MAXQ = 105 + 7. I iterated only over that dimension, which has size MAXN. The first code is about 5 times slower. Could anyone please explain why? Thanks in advance.
| Name |
|---|


