There're going to be held 2020 TCO South America and a parallel round. I didn't see any info about it anywhere, except from Arena. hmehta, is it rated?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
There're going to be held 2020 TCO South America and a parallel round. I didn't see any info about it anywhere, except from Arena. hmehta, is it rated?
Here are 2 solutions of the same problem: 20274603, 20298628. The only difference between them is two-dimensional array last. In first case it was last[MAXN][MAXQ], and in the second one — last[MAXQ][MAXN]. MAXN = 103 + 7, MAXQ = 105 + 7. I iterated only over that dimension, which has size MAXN. The first code is about 5 times slower. Could anyone please explain why? Thanks in advance.
| Name |
|---|


