I can't understand it. Only 6 people have passed it in the contest.
I can't understand it. Only 6 people have passed it in the contest.
| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
Imagine tourist being unable to solve a 2100 problem...
Rating system gets a "WA on test case 1610" verdict
I think that if *2100 problems are in such difficulty like this, I will never become a master.
UPD : It was updated.
Maybe because there were blues among these 6 people...
But only 6 people have passed it in the contest
Maybe Mike just calculates average rating of these people
IMO it would be faulty logic -- if tourist makes an alt, and becomes the only one to solve the problem, that shouldn't make the problem get a 800 rating. Mike wouldn't have calculated it this way
That should be $$$\frac{3366+3315+2838+1772+1714+2236}{6}\approx 2540$$$. So the problem should at least get *2500.
Calculates average performance and not rating?
So calculating average rating is a type of wrong logic.
Even so, the rating I calculated(*2500) is higher than the actual rating(*2100).
I don't think so -- a newbie ACed 1610I and the problem got a normal 3300 rating
he_____hezhou may be hehezhou 's account.
likely, but then the system shouldn't be able to tell...
Also 1603F - October 18, 2017 is *2700 but only 3 people solved the problem officially
fun fact: OddImage said 1603F - October 18, 2017 is a classical and trivival problem.
I'm curious about the way to calculate the difficulty of problems... I don't think that it's reasonable.
It is now fixed. It is now 3100. Funny that the difference is a whole 1000 in rating.
MikeMirzayanov do you type the ratings in manually?