| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3408 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
This happened in abc213d.
Diffcheck between the two codes (MLE, AC) shows that they are exactly the same, surprisingly though, the MLE code consumes about 1GB+ memory (and significantly greater time) whereas the AC one only consumes 250MB.
It's been bugging me a lot, why would this happen, can anyone please help?
Thanks in advance.
Auto comment: topic has been updated by warks (previous revision, new revision, compare).
For reference, this blog discussed a similar issue, though a definitive conclusion was not reached.
Seems like Mike resolved it as both the submissions in that blog display an AC verdict now, is this a platform issue? Should I tag Atcoder admins? Since I am unsure whether it is a language issue or a platform one, I would rather not disturb them for this.
Again, any inputs would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.