I couldn't find relevant answers to this online.
If I do int pos = iterator1 - iterator2
would this be an O(n) or a O(1) operation.
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
I couldn't find relevant answers to this online.
If I do int pos = iterator1 - iterator2
would this be an O(n) or a O(1) operation.
| Name |
|---|



$$$O(1)$$$
To specify, I assume this is C++. For a RandomAccessIterator (for e.g. a vector) this is indeed $$$O(1)$$$. If it's a weaker form of iterator, e.g. a BidirectionalIterator from a set, then first of all it won't compile, you will need
int pos=distance(it1, it2)and also it will be $$$O(it_2-it_1)=O(N)$$$.If you are more innterested, you can have a look at the specifications of iterators here. I think the two iterator types I named are the most common ones in CP (just my feeling).
for the case of set and map it's $$$O(N)$$$ but there is a work around.
using the __gnu_pbds library
you can create an ordered_map or ordered_set and take advantage of .order_of_key() to find the difference in $$$log(n)$$$ .