Just leaving this here:
auto q = priority_queue(greater(), vector{pair{0ll, 0}});
// or
auto q = priority_queue(greater(), vector{tuple{0ll, 0, 0}});
Only works in GCC 9.1 and up, so you have to submit as GCC C++17 64bit in Codeforces.
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3857 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 3 | maroonrk | 3534 |
| 4 | tourist | 3528 |
| 5 | Kevin114514 | 3510 |
| 6 | turmax | 3411 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3367 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | strapple | 3317 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 145 |
| 4 | Errichto | 139 |
| 5 | adamant | 136 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 134 |
| 7 | nik_exists | 133 |
| 7 | DNR | 133 |
| 9 | AmShZ | 130 |
| 10 | Dominater069 | 129 |
Just leaving this here:
auto q = priority_queue(greater(), vector{pair{0ll, 0}});
// or
auto q = priority_queue(greater(), vector{tuple{0ll, 0, 0}});
Only works in GCC 9.1 and up, so you have to submit as GCC C++17 64bit in Codeforces.
| Name |
|---|



I like to write:
Its a bit longer than your option but you dont need to worry about the compiler version. Alternatively you can just use negative values to order correctly in the priority queue, but I dont like that either
not related, but my friend likes to write
:D
Why bother?..
Because set is much slower?