→ Обратите внимание
→ Лидеры (рейтинг)
| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3898 |
| 2 | tourist | 3840 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
| 4 | ksun48 | 3691 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
| 6 | ecnerwala | 3525 |
| 7 | gamegame | 3477 |
| 8 | Benq | 3468 |
| 9 | Ormlis | 3381 |
| 10 | maroonrk | 3379 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
→ Лидеры (вклад)
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 168 |
| 2 | -is-this-fft- | 165 |
| 3 | Dominater069 | 161 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 160 |
| 5 | atcoder_official | 159 |
| 6 | djm03178 | 157 |
| 7 | adamant | 153 |
| 8 | luogu_official | 150 |
| 9 | awoo | 149 |
| 10 | TheScrasse | 146 |
→ Найти пользователя
→ Прямой эфир
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2025 Михаил Мирзаянов
Соревнования по программированию 2.0
Время на сервере: 31.01.2025 09:15:16 (k3).
Десктопная версия, переключиться на мобильную.
При поддержке
your unordered_map got an anti-hash test(unordered_map worst case look time O(n) due to all hashes colliding with each other). And because MS C++ 2017 is a different compiler, so unordered map hashing works a bit different. In whatever way, the three should get timelimit anyways. I recommend you not to use unordered_map in hackable contests or in sites that have system testing afterwards like codeforces.
At least it could have given TLE at the time of contest so i would have changed the unordered_map to map.
Sadly, authors usually don't usually think of anti-hashing tests but hackers do. Here is a really cool blog which helps if you want to use unordered_map.
But here all keys are ints and not int64_t/long longs, so their hashes do not (should not?) collide, so what's the real reason?
Numbers till $$$10^9$$$. At least not all hashes collide, but a lot of them. If numbers were only till $$$10^6$$$ or lower, I guess it was gonna pass.
Yeah, I did not realize that the hash function includes % bucket_count, thank you