Knowing the fact that 1D Fenwick Trees can be built in linear time, I am assuming that the 2D version can be built in quadratic time. I didn't manage to find anything about this. Can you help me with some links/ideas?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
Knowing the fact that 1D Fenwick Trees can be built in linear time, I am assuming that the 2D version can be built in quadratic time. I didn't manage to find anything about this. Can you help me with some links/ideas?
| Name |
|---|



For every updation in linear Fenwick tree we require O(log N ) time complexity.It takes Nlog(N) for linear or 1-D. sebi420p How can we built in just O(N) .
Actually, we can build a bit in O(n). Every index in a bit indicates the sum of the range [i — lowbit(i), i]. So, if you build a prefix sum array beforehand, you can use it to build the bit in O(n).
You can check this link
Thanks, that's a better way to build a bit.
Thank you!
Why is he downvoted, it's a good question.
I was wondering that too..
okwedook Thank you.