→ Обратите внимание
→ Трансляции
→ Лидеры (рейтинг)
| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3857 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 3 | maroonrk | 3534 |
| 4 | tourist | 3528 |
| 5 | Kevin114514 | 3510 |
| 6 | turmax | 3411 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3367 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | strapple | 3317 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
→ Лидеры (вклад)
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 144 |
| 3 | nik_exists | 144 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 136 |
| 7 | maroonrk | 134 |
| 8 | DNR | 132 |
| 9 | AmShZ | 131 |
| 10 | Dominater069 | 129 |
→ Найти пользователя
→ Прямой эфир
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2026 Михаил Мирзаянов
Соревнования по программированию 2.0
Время на сервере: 06.09.2026 05:37:53 (k3).
Десктопная версия, переключиться на мобильную.
При поддержке
A little more than an hour remaining till registration closure
Will you provide screencast as for previous SRM's?
Why do you need a screencast? Is it help you to solve problems?
In screencast you could see how ideas are growing, you could see places, where solver made a mistake and where write something just in seconds. You could understand why solver choose this way of solving. Also you could understand why was chosen special idioms/classes/collections of concrete programming language.
Everybody could write an analysis after solving a problem. Great screencast is much rare thing.
Yeah, this is exactly why watching Egor's screencasts is a pleasure
probably put a minus those who watched a screen cast, but does not know about the possibility of rewinding and viewing on the speed of 2x-16x.
Ideas grow in your head or on a paper, you see nothing but coding warching a screencast.
Spending an hour and twenty minutes practicing is much more better idea.
I say what I know, not what I assume. I watched a few screen-casts and I think is useful to do this several times a year. Why not?
No, I would write from 2 monitor setup this time