By script, I mean what method do you use to stress test your solution(code maybe?)
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
By script, I mean what method do you use to stress test your solution(code maybe?)
| Name |
|---|



i verify it on paper firstly even then if i get WA i try to think of corner cases most of the times it works
I do this only when the following is true (quite frankly, this happens often):
problem is about an array without special properties (that is, random array will be a valid input)
I came up with greedy algorithm or dp without a solid proof, and it gives WA
I can write a checker, i.e. check that my answer is correct -- for example if I have to output a number of transformations that will lead to something that is easy to check
Then I just replace each "read" statement with something like
rand() % max_value_for_this_variable, and run all this in a loop of 1000 and see if there is a mistake somewhere.Sometimes I also do this if I know I have an integer overflow or out-of-bounds access, but cannot find where.