| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 4009 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3773 |
| 3 | Radewoosh | 3646 |
| 4 | ecnerwala | 3624 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 5 | Benq | 3620 |
| 7 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
| 8 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 8 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 2 | cry | 161 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 160 |
| 4 | -is-this-fft- | 159 |
| 5 | atcoder_official | 158 |
| 5 | awoo | 158 |
| 7 | adamant | 155 |
| 8 | nor | 154 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 152 |
| 10 | Dominater069 | 149 |
Hello Everyone,
In my template I use macros like #define ll long long int and many others.
But I found on web that it takes more memory and it is wise to use typedef long long int ll or using ll=long long int
I am confused. Which will be efficient for time as well as memory. Please help me. Thanks in advance.
Here somebody wrote a useful comment.
They're both wrong, use #define int long long
Why?
Not a lot of people outside China know this, but there is actually a very simple trick you can use to speed up your code. To use it just simply write
And now all your long longs are booleans, and you can put them in a bitset. Good luck!
pure evil.