Look at these solutions: This one and this one . Is not it cheating? MikeMirzayanov what are you going to do against this?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
Look at these solutions: This one and this one . Is not it cheating? MikeMirzayanov what are you going to do against this?
| Name |
|---|



k
Why do you post this?
Codeforces are bad. You can cheat freely in it.
Your English are bad :(
*your english is bad :(
codeforces have s at the end so it should go with are :))
Edit : clearly my comment was not to provide true statement
Now I know that my english is very bad :(
If I'm not mistaken, we're allowed to used macros but not to obfuscate the code.
The first solution should be removed.
Sure, it is a cheating. I'll handle it.
Hey, didn't you notice the user above you?
Original solution: 77 ms
After obfuscation: 31 ms
So he did not try to cheat, he tried to make it faster.
Also the fun part is that he forgot to remove the first line with the original author's name.
C++11 takes less time than c++17
Hi Sir Is there proof for this? I am curious.
https://www.quora.com/Is-C-becoming-faster-or-slower-as-new-revisions-come-out-C-11-C-14-C-17-etc