Hey! I have a question. If I have to calculate a pow b modulo mod, with b>mod, is it the same with a pow (b % (mod-1)?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
Hey! I have a question. If I have to calculate a pow b modulo mod, with b>mod, is it the same with a pow (b % (mod-1)?
| Name |
|---|



By Euler's Theorem, if gcd(a, n) = 1,
. If m happens to be a prime, then phi(m) = m - 1.
If "gcd(a,n)=1", you mean gcd(a,m)=1? I can not see the n
Upps, sorry. You're right, that was meant to be an m :)
Thanks!
Even when gcd(a, n) > 1, the following holds: If b ≥ φ(m),
. When m is large and you cannot efficiently factor it to compute φ(m) and b is given in decimal form, you can still use fast exponentiation. Process digits of b one by one starting from the most significant one and use a10b + c = (ab)10 × ac.