my approach to this problem is:
1. build mst using prims
2. run a bfs from any special node to find the maximum edge between special nodes and that edge is the answer for all nodes.
my submission
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3857 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 3 | maroonrk | 3534 |
| 4 | tourist | 3528 |
| 5 | Kevin114514 | 3510 |
| 6 | turmax | 3411 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3367 |
| 9 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 10 | strapple | 3317 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 145 |
| 4 | Errichto | 139 |
| 5 | adamant | 136 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 134 |
| 7 | nik_exists | 133 |
| 7 | DNR | 133 |
| 9 | AmShZ | 130 |
| 10 | Dominater069 | 129 |
my approach to this problem is:
1. build mst using prims
2. run a bfs from any special node to find the maximum edge between special nodes and that edge is the answer for all nodes.
my submission
| Name |
|---|



Here is an issue:
UPD: the second one should be
conn[v].size()-1(notu), as I understood from your code. I've just tested it, but it still gives RTE, but on test 29.UPD2: the second RTE has just been solved. The issue was in using the same
posfor bothuandv. The new verdict is WA on test 33. See my submissions for more details.