Could anyone explain to me the proof for such a method of checking whether a number is primitive root or not http://zobayer.blogspot.com/2010/02/primitive-root.html
why should i check only certain numbers to be equal to one or not ?
Could anyone explain to me the proof for such a method of checking whether a number is primitive root or not http://zobayer.blogspot.com/2010/02/primitive-root.html
why should i check only certain numbers to be equal to one or not ?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3408 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
| Name |
|---|



Since n is a prime, we know that gφ(n) = gn - 1 = 1. We want to know if there is another exponent e < n - 1 such that ge = 1.
Let e be the smallest, positive integer with ge = 1. This means that the exponents that give 1 are exactly 0, e, 2e, 3e, .... This means that e divides n - 1. If e is really smaller than n - 1, then there must exist a prime factor p of n - 1, such that e still divides
. Which means that
.
So it is sufficient to check if any of the terms
, with p prime and p | n - 1, is equal to 1.