Is 10^9 computation is possible before 2.00 seconds? If not possible,how my solution works of following problem? Problem link: http://codeforces.me/problemset/problem/851/C Submission: http://codeforces.me/contest/851/submission/30089349
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 164 |
1 | maomao90 | 164 |
3 | Um_nik | 163 |
4 | atcoder_official | 160 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
6 | adamant | 157 |
6 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
8 | nor | 154 |
10 | djm03178 | 153 |
Is 10^9 computation is possible before 2.00 seconds? If not possible,how my solution works of following problem? Problem link: http://codeforces.me/problemset/problem/851/C Submission: http://codeforces.me/contest/851/submission/30089349
Название |
---|
It depends on what you mean by "computation". I assume here you mean that your solution is O(n3) and n ≤ 103 hence the number 109, but for each triplet of points you process here, you are making many more auxiliary "computations", each of which take different amounts of time. If I understand you correctly, generally brute forcing 109 cases will not pass in 2 seconds, but I think your continue; and return; statements in your function pruned the search considerably (it can be shown that, by at latest the 12th iteration, there will be an acute angle).