I have a problem finding a strongly connected component of size exactly K in a Tournament Graph. Can someone help me?
Thanks in advance
Thanks in advance
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 135 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
| Name |
|---|



Thanks for your attention.
Sorry, it seems that the left side of the page is cut off for me, and therefore I cannot really read what the proof is about.
From what I gathered from the page and googled about, if a tournament of size N is strongly connected, then it is vertex pan-cyclic, which means that every vertex in G is part of a cycle of length K for 3<=K<=N. And this proof is done using induction.
However, as the page is cut off, I cannot really read it, and I think I don't really understand what I read too XD. Is it okay for you to explain it here? Is the proof and algorithm similar to the proof and algorithm for finding a hamiltonian path in a tournament? I tried to adapt that algorithm and it seems that I got into some counterexamples.