I have a problem finding a strongly connected component of size exactly K in a Tournament Graph. Can someone help me?
Thanks in advance
Thanks in advance
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3810 |
| 2 | Benq | 3676 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3655 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 3463 |
| 5 | strapple | 3447 |
| 6 | Um_nik | 3387 |
| 7 | heuristica | 3322 |
| 8 | turmax | 3317 |
| 9 | tourist | 3307 |
| 10 | jiangbowen | 3291 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 150 |
| 2 | maspy | 150 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 141 |
| 5 | Errichto | 139 |
| 6 | adamant | 137 |
| 7 | AmShZ | 135 |
| 8 | BledDest | 132 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 131 |
| 10 | qwexd | 129 |
| Name |
|---|



Thanks for your attention.
Sorry, it seems that the left side of the page is cut off for me, and therefore I cannot really read what the proof is about.
From what I gathered from the page and googled about, if a tournament of size N is strongly connected, then it is vertex pan-cyclic, which means that every vertex in G is part of a cycle of length K for 3<=K<=N. And this proof is done using induction.
However, as the page is cut off, I cannot really read it, and I think I don't really understand what I read too XD. Is it okay for you to explain it here? Is the proof and algorithm similar to the proof and algorithm for finding a hamiltonian path in a tournament? I tried to adapt that algorithm and it seems that I got into some counterexamples.