# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3839 |
3 | Radewoosh | 3646 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
4 | Benq | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
7 | Geothermal | 3569 |
7 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3494 |
10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | Um_nik | 164 |
2 | maomao90 | 160 |
3 | -is-this-fft- | 159 |
4 | atcoder_official | 158 |
4 | cry | 158 |
4 | awoo | 158 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | nor | 154 |
9 | TheScrasse | 153 |
10 | maroonrk | 152 |
Name |
---|
A greedy approach could be , find which cell destroys maximal numbers of rocks in each iteration until all are destroyed.
But I cannot prove correctness.
While the number of rocks is greater than 0
{
find max in matrix count[][]
bomb that possition
re-initilize\update count[][]
}
There's your greedy.
Complexity O(N^4) and since N<25 its no biggie.
Pretty sure there's no counter example for this.