Can some one tell me how to solve this problem ?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3676 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3659 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 4 | turmax | 3450 |
| 5 | tourist | 3382 |
| 6 | strapple | 3360 |
| 7 | Um_nik | 3354 |
| 8 | squareOf105 | 3348 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3312 |
| 10 | idontwannadothis…e | 3191 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 155 |
| 2 | nik_exists | 151 |
| 3 | maspy | 149 |
| 4 | AmShZ | 145 |
| 5 | Um_nik | 143 |
| 6 | Errichto | 139 |
| 7 | BledDest | 136 |
| 8 | adamant | 134 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 132 |
| 10 | cry | 130 |
Can some one tell me how to solve this problem ?
| Name |
|---|



We iterate through the number i. Let us learn in O (1) to understand for some of the smallest substring j b [0 ... n - i - 1] can be represented as a [i 1 ... j - 1] r (a [j. .. n - 1]). To do this, calculate the prefix function (p [i]) for the string s1 = r (a) '\ 0' b and the z-function (z [i]) for the string s2 = b '\ 0' a. It is clear that for fixed i, j is the required value will be n - p [2n - i - 1], with the substring a [i 1 ... j - 1] and b [0 .. j - i] must be the same (1). The last statement is easily verified, using the calculated z-function. Is also trivial proof of the fact that if a fixed i the property (1) does not hold for the chosen j, then it will fail for large j.
The asymptotic complexity of the solution - O (n).