Can someone help me to solve this problem ? I try trie with sets in each vertex. It is TLE. how to reduce time?
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 165 |
2 | maomao90 | 164 |
3 | Um_nik | 163 |
4 | atcoder_official | 160 |
4 | adamant | 160 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
8 | nor | 154 |
Can someone help me to solve this problem ? I try trie with sets in each vertex. It is TLE. how to reduce time?
Название |
---|
Maybe ternary search trie instead of a normal trie. Note I did not read the problem.
What is ternary search trie?..
from what I tried:
Persistent trie: per query, AC, 0.61s
It's clear how to solve using segment tree storing sorted arrays in each vertex in O(n·log(n)) memory and O(log2(n)·log(maxX)) time per query.
But I haven't a clue how to solve it using persistent segment tree, can you explain please?
Non persistent trie , AC, 0.75s
Used vectors in each vertex instead of sets.