Here are TLE code and AC code of the problem 504D-Misha and XOR, the difference between them is only the condition of the for loop, but i<maxn && m>=0
is a stronger condition. Does anyone have idea about what happened? Thanks a lot.
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3993 |
2 | jiangly | 3743 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | Benq | 3564 |
7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 155 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
10 | djm03178 | 152 |
Here are TLE code and AC code of the problem 504D-Misha and XOR, the difference between them is only the condition of the for loop, but i<maxn && m>=0
is a stronger condition. Does anyone have idea about what happened? Thanks a lot.
Название |
---|
I've added
inline
and it's Accepted with the condition 11191452It's really interesting to know why this happened!
And then I changed
m>=0
tom>=-1
got Accepted... 11191443What's the difference between inline function and simple function? I used TLE code's loop condition and added inline — AC.
This is even more weird!
Here I added a variable x, and made it equal to m, it got TLE.
Here I made it equal to m+1 before the loop, and equal to m in the loop, it got AC!
Here I made it equal to m before the loop, and don't change it in the loop, it got AC!
Maybe it is a bug in the compiler optimizer? I hope someone figures that out!